LSU vs Oklahoma vs UCLA vs Utah — Jan 10, 2026 NCAA Women's Gymnastics Results | Sprouts Farmers Market Collegiate Quad | GIGA Event Radar

LSU, Oklahoma, UCLA & Utah NCAA women’s gymnastics results Jan 10 2026 Sprouts Farmers Market Collegiate Quad LSU Tigers Oklahoma Sooners OU UCLA Bruins Utah Red Rocks quad meet team totals athlete scores vault bars beam floor all-around; Maverik Center; West Valley City Utah; Salt Lake City metro; Mountain West United States; SEC Big Ten Big 12; NCAA gymnastics event radar; GIGA Event Radar NCAA coverage; women’s pro gymnastics league opportunity; professional gymnastics league; women’s pro gymnastics; booming women's sports economy; gymnast NIL; gymnastics athlete economy; NCAA audience growth; gymnastics at the olympics; global gymnastics popularity; female gymnast NIL; pro gymnast opportunities; college schedule 2026; college teams 2026

NCAA Women’s Gymnastics • January 10, 2026
Sprouts Farmers Market Collegiate Quad • Maverik Center, Utah
Rank VT
SV		 UB
SV		 BB
SV		 FX
SV		 AA
1 Oklahoma* 49.3500 49.4750 49.5000 49.1750 197.5000
Elizabeth
Blessey		 9.8000
Mackenzie
Estep		 9.90009.90009.9250
Addison
Fatta		 9.87509.92509.85009.800039.4500
Elle
Mueller		 9.8750
Ella
Murphy		 9.92509.9250
Kamila
Pawlak		 9.7750
Lily
Pederson		 9.82509.82509.82509.775039.2500
Hannah
Scheible		 9.90009.9500
Kelsey
Slade		 9.8000
Faith
Torrez		 9.92509.82509.9500
Keira
Wells		 9.82509.8000
2 LSU* 49.325 49.550 49.350 49.275 197.500
Nina
Ballou		 9.8250
Courtney
Blackson		 9.82509.9500
Kailin
Chio		 9.90009.85009.95009.900039.6000
Kylie
Coen		 9.9000
Ashley
Cowan		 9.9000
Amari
Drayton		 9.25009.0250
9.75
Emily
Innes		 9.8750
Kaliya
Lincoln		 9.82509.8500
Konnor
McClain		 9.92509.6500
9.9
Victoria
Roberts		 9.8500
Madison
Ulrich		 9.90009.90009.82509.825039.4500
Lexi
Zeiss		 9.85009.87509.8000
3 UCLA 49.2750 49.4250 49.1250 49.1750 197.0000
Ciena
Alipio		 9.92509.8000
9.95
Madisyn
Anyimi		 9.7750
9.95
Jordan
Chiles		 9.90009.90009.85009.925039.5750
Riley
Jenkins		 9.8250
Nola
Matthews		 9.87509.2000
9.8
Katelyn
Rosen		 9.82509.87509.82509.800039.3250
Ashlee
Sullivan		 9.85009.87509.7750
Tiana
Sumanasekera		 9.8750
9.95		9.9000
9.95		9.72509.850039.3500
Mika
Webster-Longin		 9.82509.80009.8000
4 Utah 49.6000 49.3750 47.8750 49.0500 195.9000
Elizabeth
Gantner		 9.8750
Ashley
Glynn		 9.9750
Zoe
Johnson		 9.8750
Avery
Neff		 10.00009.85009.77509.875039.5000
Ana
Padurariu		 8.9250
9.6		9.8000
9.9
Clara
Raposo		 9.8000
Abbi
Ryssman		 9.82509.175
9.9
Makenna
Smith		 9.82509.85009.8500
Poppy-Grace
Stickler		 9.7000
Bailey
Stroud		 9.90009.2500
9.9		9.1000
9.9
Camie
Winger		 9.7500
Ella
Zirbes		 9.92509.95009.0750
9.7		9.875038.8250
Notes:
Event scoring based on 10.0 scale
Gymnast routines with <10.0 start value indicated below apparatus score
6 gymnasts compete, 5 scores count toward team total • AA total shown for gymnasts competing 4 events

*Tie-break determined via highest team total counting all six gymnast routine scores across four events


NCAA Gymnastics Scoring Guide

▸ What is a good team score in an NCAA regular season gymnastics meet?
In NCAA women's gymnastics, a team score of 197.000 or higher is considered excellent and typically places teams in national championship contention. Scores between 196.000-196.999 are strong competitive performances, while anything above 198.000 represents elite-level execution.
▸ How does the NCAA gymnastics "6 up, 5 count" format work?
NCAA gymnastics uses a "6 up, 5 count" format where six gymnasts compete on each apparatus, but only the top five scores count toward the team total. This rewards depth and consistency across vault, bars, beam, and floor.
▸ What is considered an elite-level individual score in NCAA gymnastics?
An individual event score of 9.900 or higher is considered elite. Perfect 10.000 scores are rare and celebrated. For all-around competition, totals above 39.500 are elite-level performances.
▸ How are NCAA gymnastics rankings determined during the regular season?
NCAA gymnastics rankings use the National Qualifying Score (NQS) system, which averages a team's top six scores after dropping the highest. This rewards consistency and determines regional/national championship seeding in March.





Last updated: January 30, 2026