Tashkent World Challenge Cup 2026 | Event Finals
Thi Quynh Nhu Nguyen captured the Vault title with a 13.375 average, while Lena Bickel, Evelina Yezhova, and Lena Bickel secured victories on Uneven Bars, Balance Beam, and Floor Exercise respectively.
TASHKENT WORLD CHALLENGE CUP 2026: WOMEN'S EVENT FINAL RESULTS
Vault
Swipe right to view all data →
| Gymnast | Score (avg) |
VT 1 D / E |
VT 2 D / E |
Bonus ND |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 VIE |
Thi Quynh Nhu Nguyen |
13.375 | 13.650 5.2 / 8.450 |
12.700 4.0 / 8.700 |
0.2 |
| 2 IND |
Pranati Nayak |
13.025 | 12.950 4.4 / 8.550 |
12.700 4.4 / 8.300 |
0.2 |
| 3 UZB |
Shakhinabonu Yusufova |
12.950 | 12.850 4.2 / 8.650 |
12.650 4.0 / 8.650 |
0.2 |
| 4 UZB |
Oksana Chusovitina |
12.925 | 12.850 4.4 / 8.550 |
12.600 4.0 / 8.600 |
0.2 -0.1 |
| 5 CRO |
Mila Prpic |
12.850 | 13.000 4.2 / 8.800 |
12.300 3.6 / 8.700 |
0.2 |
| 6 IND |
Protistha Samanta |
12.850 | 12.750 4.4 / 8.350 |
12.550 4.0 / 8.550 |
0.2 |
| 7 LAT |
Anastasija Ananjeva |
12.250 | 12.650 4.0 / 8.650 |
11.450 3.0 / 8.450 |
0.2 |
| 8 GEO |
Ani Gobadze |
11.850 | 11.250 3.8 / 7.550 |
12.450 4.2 / 8.350 |
-0.2 |
Notes:
VT score = average, VT 1 + VT 2
ND = Neutral Deduction
Tie-break determined via higher single-vault score
Country codes:
CRO=Croatia • GEO=Georgia • IND=India • LAT=Latvia • UZB=Uzbekistan • VIE=Vietnam
Source: GIGA Data & Analytics
| Rank | Gymnast | Country | Score | VT1 D | VT1 E | VT1 ND | VT2 D | VT2 E | VT2 ND | Bonus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thi Quynh Nhu Nguyen | VIE | 13.375 | 5.2 | 8.450 | 4.0 | 8.700 | 0.2 | ||
| 2 | Pranati Nayak | IND | 13.025 | 4.4 | 8.550 | 4.4 | 8.300 | 0.2 | ||
| 3 | Shakhinabonu Yusufova | UZB | 12.950 | 4.2 | 8.650 | 4.0 | 8.650 | 0.2 | ||
| 4 | Oksana Chusovitina | UZB | 12.925 | 4.4 | 8.550 | -0.1 | 4.0 | 8.600 | 0.2 | |
| 5 | Mila Prpic | CRO | 12.850 | 4.2 | 8.800 | 3.6 | 8.700 | 0.2 | ||
| 6 | Protistha Samanta | IND | 12.850 | 4.4 | 8.350 | 4.0 | 8.550 | 0.2 | ||
| 7 | Anastasija Ananjeva | LAT | 12.250 | 4.0 | 8.650 | 3.0 | 8.450 | 0.2 | ||
| 8 | Ani Gobadze | GEO | 11.850 | 3.8 | 7.550 | -0.1 | 4.2 | 8.350 | -0.1 |
Uneven Bars
| Gymnast | Score (D / E) |
ND |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 SUI | Lena Bickel | 13.000 5.3 / 7.700 | |
| 2 CRO | Sofia Mester | 12.900 5.1 / 7.800 | |
| 3 SUI | Samira Raffin | 12.850 5.0 / 7.850 | |
| 4 LAT | Anastasija Ananjeva | 12.400 4.8 / 7.600 | |
| 5 KAZ | Evelina Yezhova | 12.250 4.7 / 7.550 | |
| 6 UZB | Dildora Aripova | 12.050 5.6 / 6.450 | |
| 7 GEO | Dorien Motten | 11.200 4.6 / 6.600 | |
| 8 KAZ | Amina Khalimarden | 10.950 3.4 / 7.550 |
Balance Beam
| Gymnast | Score (D / E) |
ND |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 KAZ | Evelina Yezhova | 12.850 5.1 / 7.750 | |
| 2 CRO | Tina Zelcic | 12.650 5.4 / 7.250 | |
| 3 UZB | Dildora Aripova | 12.450 4.9 / 7.550 | |
| 4 ISL | Lilja Katrín Gunnarsdottir | 12.250 4.7 / 7.550 | |
| 5 SUI | Samira Raffin | 11.800 4.8 / 7.000 | |
| 6 SUI | Lena Bickel | 11.650 5.0 / 6.650 | |
| 7 CRO | Mila Prpic | 11.350 5.1 / 6.250 | |
| 8 BUL | Nikol Sokolova | 10.950 4.3 / 6.650 |
Floor Exercise
| Gymnast | Score (D / E) |
ND |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 SUI | Lena Bickel | 13.100 5.3 / 7.800 | |
| 2 UZB | Dildora Aripova | 12.800 5.0 / 7.800 | |
| 3 UZB | Solikha Tursunboeva | 12.600 5.0 / 7.600 | |
| 4 KAZ | Darya Yassinskaya | 12.400 4.9 / 7.500 | |
| 5 BUL | Nikol Sokolova | 11.950 4.7 / 7.350 | -0.1 |
| 6 ISL | Lilja Katrín Gunnarsdottir | 11.850 4.2 / 7.650 | |
| 7 CRO | Mila Prpic | 10.750 4.7 / 6.350 | -0.3 |
| 8 CRO | Antea Sikic Kaucic | 10.500 4.1 / 6.500 | -0.1 |
| Apparatus | Rank | Gymnast | Country | Score | D-Score | E-Score | ND |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UB | 1 | Lena Bickel | SUI | 13.000 | 5.3 | 7.700 | |
| UB | 2 | Sofia Mester | CRO | 12.900 | 5.1 | 7.800 | |
| UB | 3 | Samira Raffin | SUI | 12.850 | 5.0 | 7.850 | |
| UB | 4 | Anastasija Ananjeva | LAT | 12.400 | 4.8 | 7.600 | |
| UB | 5 | Evelina Yezhova | KAZ | 12.250 | 4.7 | 7.550 | |
| UB | 6 | Dildora Aripova | UZB | 12.050 | 5.6 | 6.450 | |
| UB | 7 | Dorien Motten | GEO | 11.200 | 4.6 | 6.600 | |
| UB | 8 | Amina Khalimarden | KAZ | 10.950 | 3.4 | 7.550 | |
| BB | 1 | Evelina Yezhova | KAZ | 12.850 | 5.1 | 7.750 | |
| BB | 2 | Tina Zelcic | CRO | 12.650 | 5.4 | 7.250 | |
| BB | 3 | Dildora Aripova | UZB | 12.450 | 4.9 | 7.550 | |
| BB | 4 | Lilja Katrín Gunnarsdottir | ISL | 12.250 | 4.7 | 7.550 | |
| BB | 5 | Samira Raffin | SUI | 11.800 | 4.8 | 7.000 | |
| BB | 6 | Lena Bickel | SUI | 11.650 | 5.0 | 6.650 | |
| BB | 7 | Mila Prpic | CRO | 11.350 | 5.1 | 6.250 | |
| BB | 8 | Nikol Sokolova | BUL | 10.950 | 4.3 | 6.650 | |
| FX | 1 | Lena Bickel | SUI | 13.100 | 5.3 | 7.800 | |
| FX | 2 | Dildora Aripova | UZB | 12.800 | 5.0 | 7.800 | |
| FX | 3 | Solikha Tursunboeva | UZB | 12.600 | 5.0 | 7.600 | |
| FX | 4 | Darya Yassinskaya | KAZ | 12.400 | 4.9 | 7.500 | |
| FX | 5 | Nikol Sokolova | BUL | 11.950 | 4.7 | 7.350 | -0.1 |
| FX | 6 | Lilja Katrín Gunnarsdottir | ISL | 11.850 | 4.2 | 7.650 | |
| FX | 7 | Mila Prpic | CRO | 10.750 | 4.7 | 6.350 | -0.3 |
| FX | 8 | Antea Sikic Kaucic | CRO | 10.500 | 4.1 | 6.500 | -0.1 |
Notes:
ND = Neutral Deduction
Tie-breaks determined via higher E-score (or highest single vault for VT)
Country codes:
BUL=Bulgaria • CRO=Croatia • GEO=Georgia • ISL=Iceland • KAZ=Kazakhstan • LAT=Latvia • SUI=Switzerland • UZB=Uzbekistan
Source: GIGA Data & Analytics
Tie-breaks determined via higher E-score (or highest single vault for VT)
Country codes:
BUL=Bulgaria • CRO=Croatia • GEO=Georgia • ISL=Iceland • KAZ=Kazakhstan • LAT=Latvia • SUI=Switzerland • UZB=Uzbekistan
Source: GIGA Data & Analytics
About 2026 Senior WAG Event Finals Scoring & Format
How is a WAG event final score calculated at elite FIG events?
For uneven bars, balance beam, and floor exercise, total score = Difficulty (D) + Execution (E), minus any Neutral Deductions (ND).
GIGA displays totals and, when available, the D/E/ND components so fans can see whether a result was driven by difficulty, execution quality, or deductions.
How is the vault final ranked?
In the vault final, gymnasts perform two vaults.
The final vault result is based on the average of the two vault scores, with the highest single vault score shown when available for tie-break context.
What is the fastest way to interpret a score?
Quick read: high D = harder routine / bigger risk.
High E = cleaner routine / better landings, form, control.
ND present = a neutral penalty that reduces the total.
How are ties handled in event finals?
For bars, beam, and floor, ties are typically separated by higher E-score, then D-score if needed.
For vault, tie-break context may include the highest single vault score.
What does GIGA show on this finals results page?
GIGA organizes the event finals the way fans search for them: final rankings, medal results, apparatus score details, D/E/ND breakdowns, vault average details, and tie-break context.
Last updated: May 26, 2026